Cleeve Harper vs Adam Farag Cao Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
C. Harper vs A. Farag Cao

Cleeve Harper
CAN
l
l
l
w
w
l
w
l
l
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
24
Age
18
5'10" (178 cm)
Height
-
0
C. Rank
0
0
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
Right-Handed
Plays
-

Adam Farag Cao
CAN
w
w
l
w
w
l
l
l
l
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
24
Age
18
5'10" (178 cm)
Height
-
0
C. Rank
0
0
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
Right-Handed
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Harper 1 - 0 Cao
They have played 3 sets in total, with Cleeve Harper winning 2 and Adam Farag Cao winning 1. The last match between Cleeve Harper and Adam Farag Cao was at the M25 Edmonton, 09-10-2024, Round: R2, Surface: I.hard, with Cleeve Harper getting the victory 4-6 6-2 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Harper | 1 |
| Cao | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) M25 Edmonton(10-09-24)
Cleeve Harper
4
6
6
Adam Farag Cao
6
2
1
C. Harper vs A. F. Cao H2H Profile
C. Harper vs A. F. Cao Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Cleeve Harper has won 49.62% of points on their second serve, while Adam Farag Cao has won 37.76%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Cleeve Harper, in recent form, has won 35.57% of their opponent's second serve points, while Adam Farag Cao has won 45.31%. The same stats for first serve returns are 27.32% and 24.16% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Cleeve Harper has saved 54.55% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Adam Farag Cao has saved 57.46% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Cleeve Harper has won 40.00% of matches played (W/L 6/9), with Adam Farag Cao winning 44.44% (W/L 16/20) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Cleeve Harper has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 9/9), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 40% (W/L 6/9). Adam Farag Cao has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 50% (W/L 10/11), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 47% (W/L 14/16).
- Player level: In the last year, Cleeve Harper has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 33.33% of matches (W/L 4/8), where as Adam Farag Cao has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 47.06% of matches (W/L 16/18). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Cleeve Harper winning 1 times and Adam Farag Cao being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Cleeve Harper winning 2 and Adam Farag Cao winning 1.
- The last match between Cleeve Harper and Adam Farag Cao was at the M25 Edmonton, 09-10-2024, Round: R2, Surface: I.hard, with Cleeve Harper getting the victory 4-6 6-2 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:11:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Cleeve Harper has played against opponents with an average rank of 410.07 while Adam Farag Cao has played against players with an average rank of 255.97.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Cleeve Harper has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Adam Farag Cao has won 80% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Cleeve Harper has converted 25.00% of breakpoint opportunities, and Adam Farag Cao has converted 23.33% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Cleeve Harper vs Adam Farag Cao Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
C. Harper vs A. F. Cao H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 16 | Games Won | 9 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 2:11:0 | Average Match Time | 2:11:0 |
| 61% (45/74) | 1st Serve % | 43% (36/84) |
| 73% (33/45) | 1st Serve Win % | 75% (27/36) |
| 59% (17/29) | 2nd Serve Win % | 35% (17/48) |
| 56% (5/9) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (2/4) |
| 48% (40/84) | Return Points Win % | 32% (24/74) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Harper 54%, Cao 43%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Harper 43%, Cao 48%.
Break Points Saved %: Harper 62%, Cao 60%.
C. Harper Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-3 6-3 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-3 6-7(6) 6-4 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-2 6-1 | ||
Rubber 4 | W | 6-3 7-6(3) | ||
R1 | L | 6-3 6-4 | ||
A. F. Cao Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | L | 7-6(5) 6-1 | ||
R1 | L | 7-6(6) 3-6 7-5 | ||
R1 | L | 6-4 6-2 | ||
R1 | L | 6-3 6-1 | ||
Q3 | L | 5-0 ret. | ||

C. Harper vs A. F. Cao Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 47.19% (42/47) | YTD Win/Loss | 47.06% (24/27) |
| 48.74% (97/102) | Sets Win/Loss | 48.62% (53/56) |
| 50.05% (936/934) | Games Win/Loss | 50.55% (509/498) |
| 48.21% (27/29) | Hard Win/Loss | 47.62% (10/11) |
| 50.00% (9/9) | Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 40.00% (6/9) | Indoor Hard W/L | 46.67% (14/16) |
| 0.1 | Aces Per Game | 0.15 |
| 91 | Aces Total | 74 |
| 0.19 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.21 |
| 177 | Total Double Faults | 103 |
| 1:3:48 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 386.87 | Average Opponent Rank | 236.71 |
| 64% (2398/3745) | 1st Serve % | 52% (858/1637) |
| 63% (1513/2398) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (576/858) |
| 50% (670/1347) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (345/778) |
| 39% (149/379) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 34% (48/141) |
| 40% (1463/3667) | Return Points Win % | 36% (563/1564) |
| 100.00% (1/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 33.33% (8/16) | Challenger W/L | 0.00% (0/3) |
| 51.56% (33/31) | Futures W/L | 50.00% (24/24) |
| 47% (41/87) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 49% (24/49) |
| 57% (8/14) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 38% (3/8) |
| 39% (9/23) | Deciding Set Win % | 44% (4/9) |
| 86% (42/36) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (25/22) |
| 14% (42/6) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (25/3) |
| 13% (47/6) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 8% (26/2) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
08:30 AM 18/11/25
Prediction04:00 AM 18/11/25
Prediction03:30 AM 18/11/25
Prediction06:30 AM 18/11/25
Prediction04:00 AM 18/11/25
Prediction12:00 PM 18/11/25
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Simona Waltert vs Solana Sierra Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group C – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Linda Noskova vs Antonia Ruzic Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group D – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Iga Swiatek vs Gabriela Lee Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group B – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Carlos Alcaraz vs Jannik Sinner Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Ella Seidel vs Hanne Vandewinkel Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group F – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Prediction Of Alcaraz Vs Sinner H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
Top Predictions Today
01:50
H2H 0-0
02:00
H2H 0-0
02:05
H2H 0-0
02:05
H2H 0-0
03:30
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Bergamo Challenger
Italy
Florianopolis Challenger
Brazil
Guayaquil Challenger
Ecuador
Montemar Challenger
Spain
Soma Bay Challenger
Egypt
Sydney Challenger
Australia
Yokohama Challenger
Japan
M15 Bhubaneswar
India
M15 Gimcheon
Korea, Rep.
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M15 Monastir
Tunisia
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M25 Antalya
Turkey
M25 Heraklion
Greece